Sunday Gospel
              Reflection
            
              July 13, 2025, Cycle C
              Luke 10:25-37
              Reprinted by permission of the, “Arlington Catholic
              Herald.”
            
        Good Samaritan
        By Fr. Richard A. Miserendino
Home Page
        To Sunday
          Gospel Reflections Index
        
        
Often, the most familiar
        parts of the
        Bible are the most revolutionary.
Within them, God’s grace
        hides in plain
        sight. It’s veiled from our eyes by the fact that we’ve “heard
        it all before”
        and that our vision is often limited to what we’re looking to
        see. This is
        definitely the case with our Gospel today. Everyone hears the
        parable of the
        Good Samaritan, and our minds jump right to the (seemingly)
        obvious conclusion:
        We should do good deeds for people in need. Jesus would want
        that. End of
        story.
But the heart of the
        parable is a
        literal revolution. How so? The passage begins with some basics
        about salvation
        given by a scholar of the law: Love God above all things and
        your neighbor as
        yourself. Then comes the question — “But who is my neighbor?”
        It’s a fairly
        common question which touches on a fairly popular issue:
        justice. So many in
        our world are concerned about justice, equality, and equity, and
        rightly so.
        Yet, often the conversation gets reduced to, “But who is my
        neighbor?” Who am I
        legally required to help? What do other people owe me? What are
        my rights?
        Justice is principally something done or owed to “me” as an
        individual.
The legal scholar’s
        question provokes
        the parable that we call the Good Samaritan. The revolution
        begins with the
        fact that the hero of the story is a Samaritan, who would have
        been seen as an
        undesirable person at the time. That alone should clue us into
        the fact that
        Jesus is seeking to give our world and perspective a spin. We
        leave here the
        usual interpretations of the passersby and the coins and
        ministrations of the
        Samaritan to other commentaries. It is the end of the story that
        is the most
        head-spinning, though. It comes with a question from Jesus in
        return: “Which of
        the three (priest, Levite or Samaritan) was neighbor to the
        man?”
Catch what happens here:
        Neighbor is
        converted from a noun to a verb — something done for others
        rather than
        something depending on their relation to us. The perspective of
        justice has
        been reoriented radically. Rather than asking “What am I owed?”,
        Jesus
        challenges us to ask: Who should I aid? This tracks with St.
        Thomas Aquinas’
        definition of justice: “The virtue by which we render another
        person their
        due.” In contrast to so much of the world that seeks to fill its
        own bowl
        first, justice and “being neighbor” is primarily concerned with
        looking to the
        needs of others and being prompt to place ourselves at their
        service. It’s a
        moral revolution, for sure.
Yet, there’s a final
        note we can add
        here: Typically, when the Good Samaritan is considered within
        the tradition of
        the church, the Samaritan is considered as a type of symbol of
        Christ, and we
        in our broken humanity as the robbed man. We then are enjoined
        to imitate
        Christ. This is definitely true and an aspect of the parable. We
        can call this
        the classic interpretation. Yet, it is also worth noting that
        Christ never
        specifically identifies himself with any one character
        exclusively.
Thus, it is also
        possible to consider
        Christ in another place in the Gospel: as the robbed man
        himself. Consider
        Christ leaves the riches of heaven (Jerusalem) to come on a
        mercy mission to us
        here on earth (Jericho). Therein, he is promptly set upon by
        robbers (us and
        our sins) and left for dead. There is a solidarity between the
        robbed man and
        the Crucified Lord — ravaged by sin and left for dead. The
        Father (the
        Samaritan) pours out his love and ministrations in the
        Resurrection.
This opens an additional
        revolutionary
        perspective to the parable that solidifies the classical
        interpretation above.
        What saves us is not mere do-gooder deeds as neighbor to
        strangers. Rather,
        what saves is our being configured to Christ by baptism and
        entering into the
        Father’s love. The classical interpretation draws us into the
        body and ministry
        of Christ through love. Gathered into that same love, we then
        minister to
        Christ present in the poor and our neighbor, the second
        interpretation. The
        Good Samaritan shows the fullness of Christian life. We are
        healed in Christ.
        And what saves is that healing, which sets us free to be
        neighbor and minister
        to Christ imaged in the very people we serve. By that standard
        we will be
        judged. It’s a conversion of heart and a revolution of love if
        we only have
        eyes to see it and hearts to receive it.